Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Deep proximal margin rebuilding with direct esthetic restorations: a systematic review of marginal adaptation and bond strength

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2022³â 47±Ç 2È£ p.15 ~ 15
Ismail Hoda S., Ali Ashraf I., Mehesen Rabab El., Juloski Jelena, Garcia-Godoy Franklin, Mahmoud Salah H.,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Ismail Hoda S. ) - Mansoura University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Operative Dentistry
 ( Ali Ashraf I. ) - Mansoura University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Operative Dentistry
 ( Mehesen Rabab El. ) - Mansoura University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Operative Dentistry
 ( Juloski Jelena ) - University of Belgrade School of Dental Medicine Clinic for Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry
 ( Garcia-Godoy Franklin ) - University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Dentistry Department of Bioscience Research
 ( Mahmoud Salah H. ) - Mansoura University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Operative Dentistry

Abstract


This review aimed to characterize the effect of direct restorative material types and adhesive protocols on marginal adaptation and the bond strength of the interface between the material and the proximal dentin/cementum. An electronic search of 3 databases (the National Library of Medicine [MEDLINE/PubMed], Scopus, and ScienceDirect) was conducted. Studies were included if they evaluated marginal adaptation or bond strength tests for proximal restorations under the cementoenamel junction. Only 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. These studies presented a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of the materials used and the methodologies and evaluation criteria of each test; therefore, only a descriptive analysis could be conducted. The included studies were individually evaluated for the risk of bias following predetermined criteria. To summarize the results of the included studies, the type of restorative material affected the test results, whereas the use of different adhesive protocols had an insignificant effect on the results. It could be concluded that various categories of resin-based composites could be a suitable choice for clinicians to elevate proximal dentin/cementum margins, rather than the open sandwich technique with resin-modified glass ionomers. Despite challenges in bonding to proximal dentin/cementum margins, different adhesive protocols provided comparable outcomes.

Å°¿öµå

Subgingival cervical margin; Open sandwich technique; Bonding to gingival dentin; Marginal quality

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed